Story · 2026-10-15
WE paid Trudeau's family. He stayed in the room for WE's deal.
His Finance Minister broke the ethics law three ways, the Commissioner found.
In May 2020 Justin Trudeau's cabinet gave a student grant program to WE Charity to run. WE had paid his mother and brother to speak, and invited his Finance Minister's family on trips abroad, which the minister later repaid. Neither man left the room. The Ethics Commissioner found Bill Morneau broke the Conflict of Interest Act three ways. He cleared Trudeau. Trudeau "had the opportunity to further WE's private interests", the Commissioner found, but on stepping aside there was "no requirement to do so under the Act".
Bill Morneau, Minister of Finance, 2015 to August 2020, found in breach · Justin Trudeau, Prime Minister, 2015 to March 2025, cleared · Craig Kielburger, WE's founder (Craig Kielburger) · Marc Kielburger, WE's founder (Marc Kielburger)
On 22 May 2020, Justin Trudeau's cabinet ratified a summer grant program for students, with WE Charity to run it. WE had paid the Prime Minister's mother for 27 speaking engagements and his brother for 9. It had invited his Finance Minister's wife and one of her daughters to Kenya, and the minister went with his family to WE's work in Ecuador; Morneau repaid WE's share of both trips in July 2020. Both men stayed in the room.
The agreement put up to $543.5M of public money behind WE's foundation: $13 for every person in Canada. About $43.5M of that was earmarked for WE's own programming and administration. That was a ceiling, not a payment. $30.0M went out. WE told MPs all of it would go back, and CTV News reported in September 2020 that it had. Our read: what did not come back is the thing a cabinet owes you, a decision about your money made by people with nothing riding on it.
Trudeau knew of the ties. On 8 May he pulled the item from cabinet "given his relatives' ties to WE"; he told MPs he learned how much WE had paid them only after the program launched. Two weeks later it came back in the same form, and he stayed. His Finance Minister, whom the Commissioner found was a friend of WE's founder "within the meaning of the Act", voted for it; the founder said he did not consider the Morneaus personal friends. Both ministers later told MPs they should have stepped out. On Monday 17 August Morneau resigned and announced a bid to lead the OECD. On the Tuesday Trudeau prorogued Parliament, saying the government needed a reset, and the ethics committee's summer study of WE lapsed.
Our read
Our read. The Ethics Commissioner found that Bill Morneau, as Finance Minister, broke the Conflict of Interest Act three ways. He gave WE preferential treatment by letting his staff "disproportionately assist" it, and he took part in the decisions on its money. That is a finding, not our opinion.
The Commissioner cleared Justin Trudeau. He found no personal relationship between Trudeau and the Kielburgers, and no role for Trudeau in the public service's recommendation. But Trudeau knew of his relatives' ties to WE, and pulled the item once for that reason. He told MPs he learned what WE had paid them only after the program launched. He stayed in the room when it came back unchanged, and approved the agreement himself, though the Commissioner found he did not receive a copy of it. He has said he should have left. On those facts, our judgement is that this was cronyism: a decision on public money, taken in a room where the two most powerful men at the table had ties to the winner, and neither stepped out. The law let Trudeau stay. That is the failure.
Then Morneau resigned, announcing a bid to lead the OECD, and the next day Trudeau prorogued Parliament while the ethics committee was studying WE. His stated reason was a reset. The summer study lapsed; the Commissioner reported in May 2021, and the committee took the matter up again in the next session. Our read: a Prime Minister whose family WE had paid shut Parliament while a committee was studying the deal. We do not know his motive, and he has given his reason; the timing is his to answer for.
What it cost you:
Committed: up to $543.5M behind WE's foundation, $13 for every person in Canada, about $43.5M of it earmarked for WE's own programming and administration. A ceiling, not money paid.
Sent: $30.0M. WE told MPs it would all go back, and CTV News reported in September 2020 that it had.
Morneau's family trips: $41,366, repaid on the day he testified, after the Commissioner wrote to him.
The investigations and the shutdown: not costed. That blank is the figure.
Per-person figures divide the dollar amount by Canada's population on 1 July 2026.
Morneau resigned, and Trudeau backed his bid to lead the OECD; he withdrew in January 2021. The Commissioner's finding against him came in May 2021. Trudeau was cleared, and the Supreme Court has sent the challenge to that clearance back to be heard. WE announced it would wind down in Canada.
Bardish Chagger, whom the ethics committee's majority report found "failed in her obligation to be accurate with a committee" about WE (the Liberal members dissented), has sat on that same committee as a member since 29 April 2026, in the 45th Parliament. Is that who you want on the committee that questions the next minister about ethics?
He should have left the room. In July he told MPs so.
The story
It starts with a pitch. On 7 April 2020, Craig Kielburger spoke with the Small Business minister, Mary Ng, about a WE social entrepreneurship program, and sent her office the proposal two days later. On 10 April he emailed the Finance Minister, Bill Morneau, and the minister Bardish Chagger, separately, with a copy. Morneau says he read the email, not the proposal.
WE was not a stranger at Finance. The Ethics Commissioner later "determined they are friends within the meaning of the Act." In July 2017 Marc Kielburger had invited Morneau's wife and one of her daughters to WE's facilities in Kenya, where Craig Kielburger had a private dinner with them. That December Morneau went with his family to WE's work in Ecuador. In May 2017 Kielburger had thanked him for "years of incredible championing and support". Other ministers, the Commissioner noted, got their title and last name. Morneau's wife gave WE 2 donations for the family foundation, in April 2018 and June 2020. Kielburger told the Commissioner he did not consider the Morneaus personal friends.
On 17 April Chagger took a call from Kielburger. WE's own summary says she suggested a service stream for youth. She told the ethics committee that at the time of the call she was unaware the Prime Minister would announce youth programming five days later. On 19 April, the day the Commissioner says Morneau should have stepped aside, Rachel Wernick of ESDC called WE herself. On 20 April Morneau's policy adviser, Amitpal Singh, suggested bringing WE "into the fold" once policy was approved. On 21 April, the ethics committee's majority report records, Singh had money for WE written into a decision document for Morneau "without ministerial approval", and Morneau recommended setting aside $900.0M for a student grant.
Singh had asked WE to expand its pitch, then sent it to the Prime Minister's Office and Finance without showing Morneau. With that on the table, the Commissioner found, officials "had no alternative but to reach out to WE." Our read of the pattern: a pitch from the man the Commissioner found was Morneau's friend, expanded by WE at the request of Morneau's adviser, reached the public service as the obvious choice.
On 24 April Finance and ESDC officials called WE to discuss its capacity. On 5 May Chagger took the program to the cabinet's COVID committee, with the public service's recommendation that WE run it.
On 8 May Trudeau and his chief of staff, Katie Telford, pulled the item from cabinet's agenda "given his relatives' ties to WE", and he asked for more analysis. WE had paid his mother for 27 of her 28 engagements with it and his brother for 9. His wife had been an honorary WE ambassador. On 22 May the item came back in the same form. Neither Trudeau nor Morneau recused himself. Morneau voted in favour.
On 4 June, the same report records, WE got permission to claim its costs back to 5 May, at its own risk; a minister later told the committee Chagger authorized it. The agreement never went to the Treasury Board; Finance said Chagger already had the authority to sign it. On 21 June Telford approved it going ahead, and on 22 June Trudeau approved it. The Commissioner found he "did not receive a copy of the contribution agreement and did not have any input" in negotiating it. On 23 June, the report records, WE's foundation signed, "backdated to 5 May 2020". The ceiling was $543.5M, about $43.5M of it earmarked for WE's own programming and administration.
$30.0M went out to WE. Marc Kielburger told MPs that "all the dollars have been or will be sent back", and CTV News reported in September that WE had returned it all. The Public Accounts line that would confirm it is still to be read.
Then the testimony. On 22 July Morneau told MPs he should have recused himself, and that he had that day written WE a cheque for $41,366 for the trips. On 30 July Trudeau said: "I should have recused myself, but I didn't." He said he learned what WE had paid his family only after the program launched. Telford said she shared "some responsibility". The ethics committee's majority report later said Chagger "failed to disclose her 17 April 2020 meeting with Mr. Craig Kielburger" when she spoke at the Finance Committee, and "failed in her obligation to be accurate with a committee". The Liberal members dissented from the report. Chagger told the committee that at the time of the call she did not know the Prime Minister would announce youth programming five days later.
On Monday 17 August Morneau resigned and announced a bid to lead the OECD, and Trudeau said Canada would "vigorously support" his bid to lead the OECD. On Tuesday 18 August, on Trudeau's advice, Parliament was prorogued. His stated reason: "We need to reset the approach of this government". The ethics committee's summer study of WE lapsed. On 9 September WE said it would wind down in Canada. In January 2021 Morneau withdrew from the OECD race.
The findings came on 13 May 2021. Morneau broke the Act three ways, and his office's "unfettered access" for WE rested on who Kielburger was. The Commissioner also found Morneau had not knowingly accepted a gift from WE. Trudeau was cleared: no preferential treatment, no personal relationship with the Kielburgers, no part in the recommendation, and, on stepping aside, "no requirement to do so under the Act". He "had the opportunity" to further WE's interests all the same.
In April 2026 Chagger took a seat on the ethics committee. In July 2026 the Supreme Court struck the clause that shielded the Commissioner from the courts, and sent the challenge to Trudeau's clearance back to be heard.
Their side
The public service picked WE, not the politicians. ESDC's Rachel Wernick told the Finance Committee on 16 July 2020 that WE was the largest youth service charity in Canada, with high technological capacity, and that the program had to launch in roughly three weeks. Chagger told the same committee that the public service recommended WE as the only organization that could deliver the program, and that she accepted the recommendation. She told the ethics committee that at the time of her 17 April call she did not know the Prime Minister would announce youth programming five days later. Trudeau told the Finance Committee on 30 July 2020 that WE received no preferential treatment from him or anyone else. He pulled the item for more analysis, and the Commissioner cleared him, finding no personal relationship with the Kielburgers and no part in the recommendation. Craig Kielburger told MPs on 28 July 2020 that public servants did not choose WE because of its relationship with politicians. The ethics committee's report records WE's denial: it says the charity drew no financial benefit, and that the WE Charity Foundation is a registered charity, not a shell. Marc Kielburger told MPs the $30.0M sent to WE would all go back; CTV News reported in September 2020 that it had. Morneau repaid the trips and apologized, and the Commissioner found he had not knowingly accepted a gift and that his daughters' ties to WE were "too remote to merit further consideration." Telford told the Finance Committee the program was a binary choice.
- House of Commons Standing Committee on Finance (FINA): Evidence, meeting 41, 43rd Parliament, 1st Session (16 July 2020), Rachel Wernick's and Bardish Chagger's testimony, 16 July 2020
- House of Commons Standing Committee on Finance (FINA): Evidence, meeting 43, 43rd Parliament, 1st Session (22 July 2020), Bill Morneau's testimony, 22 July 2020
- House of Commons Standing Committee on Finance (FINA): Evidence, meeting 45, 43rd Parliament, 1st Session (28 July 2020), Craig and Marc Kielburger's testimony, 28 July 2020
All 7 sources
- House of Commons Standing Committee on Finance (FINA): Evidence, meeting 47, 43rd Parliament, 1st Session (30 July 2020), Justin Trudeau's and Katie Telford's testimony, 30 July 2020
- Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner: The Trudeau III Report, the Commissioner's clearance of Trudeau and his finding on a personal relationship with the Kielburgers
- Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner: The Morneau II Report, the Commissioner's finding that Morneau's daughters' ties to WE were too remote to merit further consideration
- House of Commons Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics (ETHI): Questions of Conflict of Interest and Lobbying in Relation to Pandemic Spending (Report 2, 43rd Parliament, 2nd Session), the committee majority's description of the foundation, and WE's denial
The answer
The public service did recommend WE. The Commissioner traced how it got there: a pitch from the man the Commissioner found was the Finance Minister's friend (he denies a personal friendship), expanded at the request of the minister's adviser and carried to the Prime Minister's Office and Finance unseen by the minister, until officials "had no alternative but to reach out to WE." A recommendation built that way is not independent of the people who built it. Trudeau was cleared under a law that does not make a Prime Minister leave the room when the charity that paid his family is on the agenda, and he told MPs himself he should have left. Our read: a yes-or-no vote is exactly the one a conflicted minister should sit out. $30.0M went out under an agreement that never went to the Treasury Board. WE told MPs it would all go back, and CTV News reported that it had.
What we are chasing
- What does the contribution agreement say?Would settle it: The agreement itself, from ESDC's August 2020 production to the Finance Committee or an access request to ESDC: the ceiling, the advance schedule and the "at its own risk" clause.
- Did all $30.0M come back, and when?Would settle it: The Public Accounts for 2020-21, transfer payments to the WE Charity Foundation, and ESDC's confirmation.
- What did Speakers' Spotlight hand over?Would settle it: The ethics committee's records from the second session, and any tabled production of the Trudeau family's fees and expenses.
- Did anyone at WE lobby without registering?Would settle it: The Commissioner of Lobbying's closing letter or report on WE, and the Lobbying registry's 2020 entries for WE Charity and ME to WE.
- Was Trudeau's clearance lawful?Would settle it: The Federal Court of Appeal's rehearing of Democracy Watch's challenge after 2026 SCC 28.
- Where are the officials and staff now?Would settle it: GEDS, Orders in Council and departmental releases for Amitpal Singh, Michelle Kovacevic and Rachel Wernick.
The receipts
Each fact with its document and date. Tap a figure for its source.
What WE paid, and whom
- The Commissioner's report on Trudeau: "Mr. Trudeau participated in eight WE Day events starting in 2007. His spouse was an honorary ambassador for WE, hosted her own WE-related podcast and attended eight WE Day events. Mr. Trudeau's mother and brother participated in paid activities for WE." “Mr. Trudeau's mother and brother participated in paid activities for WE.”Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner (2021-05-13) ↗
4 more receipts, 2 to 5
- His mother "was engaged by WE through a speakers' bureau 28 times between October 2016 and March 2020" and "was paid for 27 of the 28 speaking engagements". WE's own figure for her fees, as CBC reported it: $250,000. “was paid for 27 of the 28 speaking engagements”Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner, section "Mr. Trudeau's relationship with WE"; WE's fee figure from CBC News, 9 July 2020 (https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/margaret-justin-trudeau-we-charity-1.5643586) (2021-05-13) ↗
- His brother: "On nine occasions between 2017 and 2018, Mr. Alexandre Trudeau was also engaged by WE through a speakers' bureau", and "he was paid for nine speaking engagements". “he was paid for nine speaking engagements”Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner (2021-05-13) ↗
- Asked whether they were paid to speak, Craig Kielburger told MPs: "Sacha, Margaret or Sophie Trudeau were paid, yes." “Sacha, Margaret or Sophie Trudeau were paid, yes.”House of Commons Standing Committee on Finance (FINA) (2020-07-28) ↗
- Trudeau, to the same committee: "I did not know how much work either of them had done with WE Charity or how much they had been paid. These were things that I would only learn after the program launched publicly." “I did not know how much work either of them had done with WE Charity or how much they had been paid.”House of Commons Standing Committee on Finance (FINA) (2020-07-30) ↗
His mother: 28 engagements, 27 of them paid. His brother: 9. Him: 8 WE Days. On 8 May he knew of his relatives' ties to WE. By his own account he learned how much they were paid only after the program launched.
The friend at Finance
- The Commissioner examined Morneau's dealings with Craig Kielburger and "determined they are friends within the meaning of the Act." Kielburger's side, in the same report: he "wrote that he did not consider the Morneaus to be personal friends." “determined they are friends within the meaning of the Act.”Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner (2021-05-13) ↗
6 more receipts, 7 to 12
- "Mr. Marc Kielburger invited Ms. McCain and one of her daughters to visit WE's facilities in Kenya, which they did in July 2017. While in Kenya, Mr. Craig Kielburger had a private dinner with Ms. McCain and her daughter." That December, "Mr. Morneau accompanied his family" to WE's work in Ecuador. “Mr. Craig Kielburger had a private dinner with Ms. McCain and her daughter.”Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner (2021-05-13) ↗
- In May 2017, in an email to Morneau's personal account, Kielburger thanked him for his "years of incredible championing and support." The Commissioner compared the tone: "When Mr. Kielburger communicated with other ministers, they were all addressed by their title and last name and through official channels." “years of incredible championing and support.”Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner (2021-05-13) ↗
- Morneau's letter to the Commissioner noted that "his spouse, Ms. Nancy McCain, had previously made two donations of $50,000 each, in April 2018 and June 2020, to WE", on behalf of their family foundation. The Commissioner accepted, on documents, that Morneau was not involved in deciding either. “his spouse, Ms. Nancy McCain, had previously made two donations of $50,000 each, in April 2018 and June 2020, to WE”Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner (2021-05-13) ↗
- His youngest daughter did an unpaid internship with WE from February 2019, then held "a contract position with ME to WE which lasted until August 2020." The Commissioner found the link between his daughters' association with WE and the grant "too remote to merit further consideration." “is too remote to merit further consideration.”Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner, section on Mr. Morneau's family members' association with WE (2021-05-13) ↗
- On 22 July 2020, the day he testified: "Today, I wrote a cheque in payment of $41,366." It covered the costs WE had paid on the 2017 trips. “Today, I wrote a cheque in payment of $41,366.”House of Commons Standing Committee on Finance (FINA), Bill Morneau's testimony (2020-07-22) ↗
- The Commissioner records that Morneau "became aware of the complimentary costs only after my letter to him on July 16, 2020", and saw receipts showing the family "had arranged and paid for their trips through a travel agent". He dropped the gift examination "in light of evidence that Mr. Morneau had not knowingly accepted a gift or other benefit from WE." “in light of evidence that Mr. Morneau had not knowingly accepted a gift or other benefit from WE”Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner, section on the 2017 trips and the gift rules (2021-05-13) ↗
2 trips, 2 donations, a private dinner and a thank-you for years of championing: the Commissioner found they were "friends within the meaning of the Act". Kielburger said he did not consider the Morneaus personal friends. The Commissioner also found Morneau never knowingly took a gift. His finding put WE's "unfettered access" to Morneau's office on "the identity of WE's representative, Mr. Craig Kielburger." Morneau never stepped out of the room.
Inside the building
- 7 April 2020: Craig Kielburger speaks with the Small Business minister, Mary Ng, and submits WE's proposal to her office on 9 April. 10 April: he "emailed Mr. Morneau and Ms. Chagger, separately", with a copy of the proposal. Morneau told the Commissioner he read the email but not the proposal. “emailed Mr. Morneau and Ms. Chagger, separately”Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner, section "April 7 to April 10: WE's Social Entrepreneurship proposal" (2021-05-13) ↗
7 more receipts, 14 to 20
- 17 April: Chagger takes a call from Kielburger and WE's Sofia Marquez. WE's summary of the call "states that Minister Chagger expressed interest in adapting the entrepreneurship proposal submitted to Minister Ng and that she suggested opening a service-stream for youth." “Minister Chagger expressed interest in adapting the entrepreneurship proposal submitted to Minister Ng”House of Commons Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics (ETHI), chapter on Minister Chagger, and the chronology entry dated 17 April 2020 (2021-06-10) ↗
- Her answer, in the same report: "Minister Chagger told the Committee that at the time of that call she was unaware that the Prime Minister would make an announcement regarding youth programming five days later". “at the time of that call she was unaware that the Prime Minister would make an announcement regarding youth programming five days later”House of Commons Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics (ETHI), chapter on Minister Chagger (2021-06-10) ↗
- 19 April: the day, the Commissioner found, that Morneau "should have recused himself". He didn't. 20 April: Amitpal Singh, one of his policy advisers, suggests colleagues "bring [WE Charity] into the fold" once policy is approved. “bring [WE Charity] into the fold”House of Commons Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics (ETHI), the chronology entry dated 20 April 2020; the recusal date from the Morneau II Report (https://www.ethicscanada.ca/en/report/d0265f98fb94ee502f95f23e45efdc90) (2021-06-10) ↗
- 21 April, in the ethics committee's majority report's chronology: "Without ministerial approval, Mr. Singh directs Ms. Kovacevic to include $12.0M for WE Charity's social entrepreneurship proposal in a decision document for Minister Morneau." The same day Morneau recommends setting aside $900.0M for the grant. “Without ministerial approval, Mr. Singh directs Ms. Kovacevic to include $12 million for WE Charity”House of Commons Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics (ETHI), the chronology entry dated 21 April 2020; the set-aside from the Morneau II Report (https://www.ethicscanada.ca/en/report/d0265f98fb94ee502f95f23e45efdc90) (2021-06-10) ↗
- The Commissioner: Singh "asked WE to expand its Social Entrepreneurship proposal and forwarded the reworked Summer Youth Proposal to the Prime Minister's Office and the Department of Finance without reviewing, analyzing or sharing it with Mr. Morneau." With that proposal on the table, ESDC's officials "had no alternative but to reach out to WE." “had no alternative but to reach out to WE.”Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner (2021-05-13) ↗
- Rachel Wernick, a senior assistant deputy minister at ESDC, told MPs: "I called WE Charity on April 19". WE was "an obvious option", she said, and "had already provided to several officials and ministers a proposal related to social entrepreneurship". “had already provided to several officials and ministers a proposal related to social entrepreneurship”House of Commons Standing Committee on Finance (FINA), Rachel Wernick's testimony (2020-07-16) ↗
- 24 April: Finance's Michelle Kovacevic and ESDC's Rachel Wernick call Kielburger and Marquez "to discuss WE Charity and its capacity." “Ms. Kovacevic and Ms. Wernick call Mr. Kielburger and Ms. Marquez to discuss WE Charity and its capacity.”House of Commons Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics (ETHI), the chronology entry dated 24 April 2020 (2021-06-10) ↗
In four days WE's pitch reached three ministers: a call with Ng, then emails to Morneau and Chagger. Morneau says he read the email, not the proposal. His own adviser asked WE to expand it, then carried the reworked proposal to the Prime Minister's Office and Finance without showing him. When the public service went looking, the Commissioner found, it "had no alternative".
The room
- 5 May: "Minister Chagger presents the CSSG proposal to the Cabinet Committee on the Federal Response to the Coronavirus Disease, including the public service's recommendation that WE Charity administer the CSSG." “including the public service's recommendation that WE Charity administer the CSSG.”House of Commons Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics (ETHI), the chronology entry dated 5 May 2020 (2021-06-10) ↗
6 more receipts, 22 to 27
- 8 May: "Given his relatives' ties to WE, he and his Chief of Staff decided to remove the presentation of the CSSG proposal from the May 8 Cabinet agenda", and he "asked that the public service conduct further analysis". He knew of the tie that day. “Given his relatives' ties to WE, he and his Chief of Staff decided to remove the presentation of the CSSG proposal”Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner, section on the May 8 Cabinet meeting (2021-05-13) ↗
- 22 May: it came back "in the same form as when it had gone before the Cabinet COVID Committee on May 5." "Cabinet ratifies the CSSG... Neither the Prime Minister nor Minister of Finance recuse themselves from this decision." Morneau "voted in favour". “Neither the Prime Minister nor Minister of Finance recuse themselves from this decision.”Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner, section on the May 22 Cabinet meeting; the ETHI chronology entry dated 22 May 2020 (https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Committee/432/ETHI/Reports/RP11397488/ethirp02/ethirp02-e.pdf); Morneau's vote from the Morneau II Report (https://www.ethicscanada.ca/en/report/d0265f98fb94ee502f95f23e45efdc90) (2021-05-13) ↗
- 4 June, in the ethics committee's majority report's chronology: "WE Charity received permission to claim eligible expenses for CSSG work back to 5 May 2020, at its own risk." Minister Rodriguez later explained that the backdating "was authorized by Minister Chagger." The agreement did not go to the Treasury Board: Finance said it "was not submitted to TBS for approval because Minister Chagger already had the authority" to sign it. “WE Charity received permission to claim eligible expenses for CSSG work back to 5 May 2020, at its own risk.”House of Commons Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics (ETHI), the chronology entry dated 4 June 2020, and the section on the Treasury Board (2021-06-10) ↗
- 21 June: the Commissioner records that staff recommended the agreement proceed and asked his chief of staff, Katie Telford, to advance it to Trudeau. "On June 21, Ms. Telford gave her approval." “On June 21, Ms. Telford gave her approval.”Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner, section "May 25 to June 21: The Prime Minister's Office reviews the contribution agreement" (2021-05-13) ↗
- 22 June: "Mr. Trudeau approved the contribution agreement with WE." The Commissioner found he "did not receive a copy of the contribution agreement and did not have any input in the process of negotiating the agreement." “Mr. Trudeau approved the contribution agreement with WE.”Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner, section on the June 2020 approvals (2021-05-13) ↗
- 23 June, in the same chronology: "The WE Charity Foundation signs the CSSG contribution agreement with ESDC, backdated to 5 May 2020." The agreement's ceiling was $543.5M; the committee's report puts about $43.5M of it for WE's own programming and administration. Marc Kielburger confirmed the ceiling to MPs: "the contract was “up to”, as you very correctly said", with the figure rounded to the nearest million. “the contract was “up to”, as you very correctly said, $543 million”House of Commons Standing Committee on Finance (FINA), Marc Kielburger's testimony; the signing from the ETHI chronology entry dated 23 June 2020 and the earmark from the same report's section on administration fees (https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Committee/432/ETHI/Reports/RP11397488/ethirp02/ethirp02-e.pdf) (2020-07-28) ↗
He pulled it once because of his relatives' ties to WE. Two weeks later it came back unchanged, and he stayed. So did his Finance Minister, who voted for it. The agreement was signed backdated, the committee's report records, and Finance says it did not need the Treasury Board.
The money: ceiling, sent, returned
- Marc Kielburger told MPs the government had sent WE $30.0M, and that "we immediately decided that we would not be taking any of those funds." “we immediately decided that we would not be taking any of those funds”House of Commons Standing Committee on Finance (FINA), Marc Kielburger's testimony (2020-07-28) ↗
2 more receipts, 29 to 30
- Asked whether it would all go back: "Yes, all the dollars have been or will be sent back." He said WE would take a loss on its own costs. “Yes, all the dollars have been or will be sent back.”House of Commons Standing Committee on Finance (FINA), Marc Kielburger's testimony (2020-07-28) ↗
- CTV News reported on 4 September 2020 that WE "has returned all the funds it has received from the government for the student program." The Public Accounts line that would confirm it is not yet in our hands. “The WE Charity has returned all the funds it has received from the government for the student program”CTV News, the page, read in full: a video report (Michel Boyer) and its summary (2020-09-04) ↗
Three numbers, three meanings. Up to $543.5M was the ceiling, about $43.5M of it for WE's own costs. $30.0M was sent. WE told MPs it would all go back, and CTV News reported that it had. The Public Accounts line is still to be read.
The questions, and the shutdown
- Morneau, 22 July: "In hindsight, I should have recused myself from discussions involving the WE organization, and I will do so in the future." “In hindsight, I should have recused myself from discussions involving the WE organization”House of Commons Standing Committee on Finance (FINA) (2020-07-22) ↗
8 more receipts, 32 to 39
- Trudeau, 30 July: "At that point, I should have recused myself, but I didn't. I decided to push back instead". His chief of staff, Katie Telford, the same day: "this obviously did not go the way it should have gone. I do share in some responsibility for that." “At that point, I should have recused myself, but I didn't.”House of Commons Standing Committee on Finance (FINA) (2020-07-30) ↗
- The ethics committee's majority report: when Chagger spoke at the Finance Committee "she failed to disclose her 17 April 2020 meeting with Mr. Craig Kielburger", and "Ms. Chagger failed in her obligation to be accurate with a committee and potentially impeded our work." The Liberal members dissented from the report. Her answer, in the same report: at the time of the call she was unaware that the Prime Minister would announce youth programming five days later. “failed in her obligation to be accurate with a committee and potentially impeded our work.”House of Commons Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics (ETHI), the majority's observations on ministerial accountability, and the chapter on Minister Chagger for her answer; the Liberal dissenting opinion follows the report (2021-06-10) ↗
- Monday 17 August: Morneau resigns as minister and MP and announces a bid to lead the OECD. Trudeau: "Canada will vigorously support his bid to lead this important global institution". “Canada will vigorously support his bid to lead this important global institution”CBC News (2020-08-17) ↗
- 26 January 2021: Morneau withdraws from the OECD race. CBC reported he said he had "failed to receive enough support to move on to the third round". “failed to receive enough support to move on to the third round”CBC News, the article (2021-01-26) ↗
- Tuesday 18 August: on "the advice of Our Prime Minister of Canada", the Governor General prorogues Parliament to 23 September. CBC: "Parliamentary business, including committees probing WE Charity matter, is suspended." Trudeau's reason, as CBC reported it: "We need to reset the approach of this government". “the advice of Our Prime Minister of Canada”Canada Gazette, Part II, the page; also CBC, 18 August 2020 (https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/liberal-government-trudeau-prorogue-government-1.5690515) (2020-08-19) ↗
- The ethics committee's summer study "lapsed once Parliament was prorogued." The Conservatives, in a supplementary opinion, say Speakers' Spotlight was due to give that committee the Trudeau family's speaking fees "in the following 24 hours". “lapsed once Parliament was prorogued.”House of Commons Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics (ETHI), the chapter on the committee's study; the Conservative opinion in PROC Report 18 (https://www.ourcommons.ca/DocumentViewer/en/43-2/PROC/report-18/page-180) (2021-06-10) ↗
- "WE Charity announced on 9 September 2020 that it would wind down operations in Canada." “WE Charity announced on 9 September 2020 that it would wind down operations in Canada”House of Commons Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics (ETHI), the chapter on WE Charity (2021-06-10) ↗
- Since 29 April 2026, in the 45th Parliament, Bardish Chagger has sat on the Commons ethics committee, the committee whose majority, in the 43rd Parliament, wrote that she "failed in her obligation to be accurate with a committee".House of Commons, committee roles, Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics, member from 29 April 2026 ↗
Two men said they should have stepped out. One chief of staff shared the blame. Morneau resigned on the Monday and announced an OECD bid. Parliament was prorogued on the Tuesday, Trudeau's stated reason a reset, and the ethics committee's summer study lapsed. The Commissioner reported in May 2021.
The findings
- Morneau II, 13 May 2021: "I therefore found that Mr. Morneau contravened subsection 6(1), section 7 and section 21 of the Act." He "gave WE preferential treatment by permitting his ministerial staff to disproportionately assist it", and "this unfettered access to the Office of the Minister of Finance was based on the identity of WE's representative, Mr. Craig Kielburger." “I therefore found that Mr. Morneau contravened subsection 6(1), section 7 and section 21 of the Act.”Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner (2021-05-13) ↗
4 more receipts, 41 to 44
- The same report: his "recommendation to set aside $900.0M in funding for the CSSG on April 21 and his participation in Cabinet discussions on May 22... provided an opportunity to improperly further WE's private interests". "In so doing, Mr. Morneau placed himself in a conflict of interest on several occasions." “Mr. Morneau placed himself in a conflict of interest on several occasions.”Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner (2021-05-13) ↗
- Trudeau III, the same day: "I therefore found that Mr. Trudeau did not contravene subsection 6(1), section 7 or section 21 of the Act." The Commissioner still found that "Mr. Trudeau had the opportunity to further WE's private interests". On recusal: "there is no requirement to do so under the Act in such circumstances." “there is no requirement to do so under the Act in such circumstances.”Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner (2021-05-13) ↗
- The same report: "I am satisfied that Mr. Trudeau did not give preferential treatment to WE", "given the absence of a personal relationship between Mr. Trudeau and Messrs. Marc and Craig Kielburger". And "Mr. Trudeau had no involvement in ESDC's recommendation that WE administer the CSSG." “I am satisfied that Mr. Trudeau did not give preferential treatment to WE”Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner, Analysis and conclusion (2021-05-13) ↗
- 30 July 2026: the Supreme Court struck the clause that shielded the Commissioner's rulings from the courts, and "returned the matter to that court to consider whether the Commissioner's decision was lawful." “returned the matter to that court to consider whether the Commissioner's decision was lawful.”Supreme Court of Canada ↗
One minister broke the Act three ways. The other was cleared: no personal tie to the Kielburgers, no hand in the recommendation, and no rule that made him leave. Six years on, a court still has to say whether the clearance was lawful.
- Published.

